[isabelle-dev] NEWS: structured Isar goal statements
makarius at sketis.net
Mon Jun 15 20:30:39 CEST 2015
On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Lars Noschinski wrote:
> I wonder whether this syntax would be useful for other situations, e.g.
> assume and assumes, too?
Something like that is in the MKM 2008 paper "Logic-free reasoning in
I was thinking about this again when brushing up the internal Isar
structures, but did not make any moves in that direction yet, due to the
following open questions:
* What is the meaning of this anyway?
assume "B x" if "A x" for x
assume "!!x. A x ==> B x"
or is it:
fix x assume "A x" assume "B x"
Since if/for in have/show is explicit notation for the eigen-context,
the second one is conceptually more obvious, but probably not to the
* What are convicing applications where spelling out !! and ==>
connectives in assumptions, or extra fix/assume context elements is
* Implementation complexity: if/for for assume and presume would demand
the same for "theorem fixes / assumes / shows / obtains", probably
also for 'obtain' and 'consider' etc.
More information about the isabelle-dev